查看: 1462|回复: 14

[人物] 意大利德比的战术复盘：司马终结老妇人的49场不败 [复制链接]

zhiling5252

Primavera

国际米兰球探

Rank: 9 Rank: 9 Rank: 9

帖子: 9465
精华: 0
CNB: 23823
注册时间: 2011-6-27

我的游戏:

电梯直达

楼主

发表于 2012-11-5 19:08:32 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览

分享到：

Juventus 1-3 Inter: unbeaten run ends at 49

Juventus lost a Serie A game for the first time under Antonio Conte, and for the first time in their new stadium.

Conte selected a partnership of Mirko Vucinic as the primary striker and Sebastian Giovinco just behind – the rest of the side was as expected.

Andrea Stramaccioni slightly surprisingly selected his tridente rather than a more cautious 3-5-1-1 system, so Fredy Guarin was only on the bench.

Juventus took the lead within twenty seconds, but Inter were the better side for the majority of the game.

Formations / pressing

It was anticipated that Stramaccioni would play a mirror image of Juventus’ formation, but in using a front three it prompted questions about how Inter would play high up the pitch. Would Stramaccioni instruct anyone to track Pirlo? Would the front three press?

The answer to both questions was, well, sort of. In terms of dealing with Pirlo, Inter’s front three took it in turns to mark him. It was rarely Antonio Cassano, who stayed wide on the left and stretched the play, but Diego Milito and Rodrigo Palacio alternated between the central and right-sided positions and ensured one was goalside of Pirlo when Juventus had the ball.

This only half-worked. Stopping Pirlo is the priority when facing Juventus, but it would be inaccurate to simply point to Inter’s victory and declare that their strategy for dealing with him was successful. Twice in the first half, Pirlo got space in midfield and dinked the all over the top of the defence for Claudio Marchisio to run onto – had either of those strikes found the net, we would be criticising Stramaccioni for the foolish decision to ignore Pirlo’s threat.

As for pressing, Inter generally stood off in open play, but pressed at goal-kicks. Because they had a numerical disadvantage in midfield, 3 v 2, it meant being very brave with the positioning of the defenders – at one point, Juan Jesus advanced crazily high up the pitch to shut down Arturo Vidal – but this made sense, with Esteban Cambiasso pushing up on Pirlo.

Juventus were already ahead by the time this situation had become clear, of course. Juve were fielding their most mobile front two, players who would drag around the ponderous Inter defence, and although the offside decision for the opener was questionable, it was Inter’s defence being drawn up the pitch that resulted in the space for midfield runners to burst through.

Possession and wing-backs

Inter recovered admirably from the initial setback, passing the ball nicely across the defence and quickly into the front three. This dominance was helped by Juve playing a reactive game with a one-nil lead, and it was surprising to see Conte’s side invite so much pressure. They had forward runners to play on the counter-attack, of course, but it helped Inter get the upper hand in the wing-back battles on the flanks.

This was particularly obvious down the left, and while Cassano wasn’t hugely involved in a game that was arguably too quick for him, his tendency to stay wide on the left forced Stephane Lichtsteiner back towards his own goal, as Juve were nervous about leaving 3 v 3 at the back. With Lichtsteiner close to the defence, Yuto Nagatomo could move higher up and got space to himself. On the other side, the battle was more even – Kwadwo Asamoah made a couple of decent runs, but Javier Zanetti played higher up and increased the pressure upon Juve, who failed to break from defence quickly.

Lichtsteiner was removed having committed a foul when on a yellow card (so he was a Cleverley rather than a Wilshere), while at half-time, Nicklas Bendtner had to replace Vucinic through injury. Therefore, Juve were two subs down by the start of the second half, and considering how effectively they’d used the bench so far this season (for both tactical and fitness reasons) it was a great constraint, especially in such a high-tempo game.

The formations after Guarin replaced Cassano
Inter equalised through Milito, from a penalty following a set-piece, and then Juventus had to up the tempo and get back in the game. They did so rather clumsily – the wing-backs naturally positioned themselves higher, but the centre-backs often moved forward and were then caught out on the counter-attack.

Guarin

The first tactical substitution of the game came after 69 minutes, and was the game’s crucial change. Cassano was removed, with Guarin replacing him. Inter moved to more of a 3-4-1-2 system, with Guarin pressing Pirlo. This changed the shape of the game, and Inter’s crucial second goal came directly as a result of Guarin’s presence. He won the ball from Pirlo, then stormed past him in a quick attack, and the ball was eventually tucked away by Milito. Guarin’s contribution was decisive, minutes after his introduction.

Juventus chucked on Fabio Quagliarella for Caceres, with Vidal going to right-wing-back, Giovinco becoming the number ten, and Juve more like 3-4-1-2.

Stramaccioni responded by taking off Milito and introducing Gaby Mudingayi to sit in front of the defence close to Giovinco, with Inter now 3-5-1-1. Juve chucked men forward, but were exposed on the counter-attack by Nagatomo and Palacio, and Inter grabbed a third.

Conclusion

Stramaccioni had two possible strategies – using Guarin with two forwards, or using only two central midfielders with a trio up top. He’ll be praised for his bravery, but the reality is that Pirlo did have opportunities to create from deep, and Inter went ahead when Guarin was introduced to press him. Was that an inspired substitution, or was he simply reverting to the strategy he should have used from the start?

Maybe a combination of the approaches was ideal – the front three forced Juventus to be conservative with the positioning of their wing-backs, and then Guarin brought renewed energy and counter-attacking ability and occupied Pirlo when the front three had tired.

..............................................................................................................................................................................................

意大利德比的战术复盘：司马终结老妇人的49场不败

1-3负于国际米兰是孔蒂治下的尤文图斯首次输掉意甲比赛，这也是他们在新阿尔卑球场的首次失利。

孔蒂在前锋线上选择武齐尼奇突前，乔文科拖后的组合——首发阵容的其他球员都与赛前的预测相同。

斯特拉马乔尼的排兵布阵则让人略感惊讶，他启用了前场三叉戟的组合，放弃了更为谨慎的3-5-1-1体系，因此瓜林坐上了替补席。

尤文图斯开场不到20秒就取得领先，但综观全场比赛，国际米兰表现更好。

阵型/压迫

赛前媒体预测斯特拉马乔尼会排出和尤文相同的3-5-2阵型，但他出人意料地排出三前锋，这也引发了人们对于国米如何进行前场压迫的疑问。斯特拉马乔尼会派专人盯防皮尔洛吗？三叉戟会进行前场反抢压迫吗？

这两个问题的答案可以说基本令人满意。在皮尔洛的问题上，国米的前场三叉戟轮流对他进行逼抢。卡萨诺做得相对少一些，他主要在左路活动，负责扯出空档，米利托和帕拉西奥经常在中路和右路换位确保有在尤文控球时，始终有人位于皮尔洛和尤文图斯球门之间的区域。

这种安排并没有完全奏效。限制皮尔洛是面对尤文图斯时的头等大事，但如果据此就简单将其认定为国际米兰的取胜因素，并且限制皮尔洛的战术是成功的结论，显然不够准确。上半场比赛，皮尔洛就有两次在中场无人防守的情况下为马尔基西奥传出过顶长传——如果马尔基西奥把握住这两次机会中的任意一次，恐怕我们现在就在批评斯特拉马乔尼在战术上对皮尔洛威胁性的不重视了。

国际米兰在运动战中通常不进行压迫，但会在发球门球时前压。由于在中场人数上处于2对3的劣势，他们的后卫在选位时必须适当靠前，小胡安一度大幅度前压以遏制比达尔，同时坎比亚索也对皮尔洛进行夹击——这种做法显然收到了不错的效果。

尤文图斯在场上局势尚未明朗的时候就取得领先。他们派上两名机动能力强的前锋，意图扯动国际米兰行动略显缓慢的后防线，尽管首开纪录的进球存在越位争议，不可否认的是，客队的防守确实被扯出空档，使得后插上的主队队员有机可乘。

控球与翼卫

国际米兰很快就从快速丢球的打击中恢复，通过传切配合来击穿尤文图斯的后卫线，迅速送到三叉戟的脚下。国际米兰拿到主动权也要归因于尤文在一球领先之后略显保守的踢法，此前我们很少看到孔蒂的球队承受如此大的防守压力。他们安排跑动型前锋收缩伺机打反击，但这却使得国米在边路的争夺中占据上风。

这种情况在左路尤其明显，卡萨诺没有过多参与比赛的快节奏攻防转换，他更多地留在左路寻找机会，这使得利希施泰纳不得不回撤盯防他，尤文显然对于后防线上3对3的局面感到紧张。当利希施泰纳回撤支援后防线时，长友佑都就可以充分前压寻找空档。而在另外一边，争夺相对平衡——阿萨莫阿有数次精彩的奔袭，但萨内蒂压得很靠上给尤文的防守施压，使他们无法快速地由守转攻。

已经身背一张黄牌的利希施泰纳在一次犯规之后被换下（他因此成为了克莱维利而不是威尔谢尔），中场休息时，本特纳换下了受伤的武奇尼奇。这使得下半场刚开始尤文就用掉了两个换人名额，考虑到本赛季他们多次有效利用换人（出于战术或体力原因）改变战局，这无疑限制了教练的调整机会，尤其是这样一场高速度快节奏的比赛。

国际米兰在一次任意球进攻中赢得点球，并由米利托主罚命中扳平比分，随后尤文图斯试图提速，夺回比赛主动权。但他们的做法显得不够聪明——翼卫自然要前压，但中后卫也经常前压就使得他们在面对国米的反击时狼狈不堪。

瓜林

比赛的第一个战术性换人在69分钟之后才到来，这也是本场比赛重要的转折点。瓜林换下卡萨诺，国米的阵型变得更像3-4-1-2，由瓜林盯防皮尔洛。这改变了比赛的进程，国米逆转比分的第二球就来自瓜林的精彩表现。他从皮尔洛脚下断球，之后迅速摆脱防守完成射门，布冯脱手后米利托补射中的。瓜林在登场之后几分钟就做出了决定性的贡献。

尤文则用夸利亚雷拉换下卡塞雷斯，将比达尔移到右翼卫位置，乔文科改打前腰，阵型也变成了3-4-1-2。

斯特拉马乔尼对此很快作出回应，他用穆丁加伊换下米利托，把他放到后卫线身前，近身盯防乔文科，阵型也随之变成3-5-1-1。尤文队员大举前压，但后防线的空档也随之暴露，长友佑都和帕拉西奥的配合为国米打进了第三球。

结论

斯特拉马乔尼有两种战术选择：上瓜林打双前锋，或者只安排两名中场中路球员而采用三前锋。他的勇气应该得到赞扬，但事实是，皮尔洛在纵深位置仍然创造出了得分机会，而国米也是在瓜林上场限制住皮尔洛之后才取得领先。这究竟是个神来之笔的换人，还是他只是回到了自己开场就应该使用的战术上呢？

也许这两种战术的融合才是理想的——上三前锋可以使得尤文的战术趋于保守，限制边路球员的发挥，而换上瓜林则为球队提供能量，加强反击，在前锋体力下降时限制皮尔洛。